Example report. This is a real Track Report from a demo track.

Example track.wav

EDM / House / Techno·10/8/2026Needs work

Address Peaks and Low-End Balance for a Clean Master

Your track meets genre loudness and dynamics, but two issues need attention. The true peak exceeds 0 dB and the low end feels too heavy. Fixing these will give a cleaner, more professional sound.

Loudness

-7.1LUFS

Typical for EDM / House / Techno: -9 to -5.5 LUFS.

True peak

0.2dBTP

Keep below -1.0 for streaming.

Dynamics

7.3dB PLR

Loudness range 1.7 LU. Higher PLR means more punch and less squashing.

Stereo

0.96correlation

NarrowWide

1 is mono, 0 is very wide, below 0 can cancel on phones and mono speakers.

How streaming will play it

Spotify: Turned down 6.9 dB to match other tracks

Apple Music: Turned down 8.9 dB to match other tracks

YouTube: Turned down 6.9 dB to match other tracks

What to fix

01

Reduce True Peaks

The true peak is above 0 dB, risking distortion.

How: Use a limiter set to 0 dB or lower the overall level by a few dB. Check the true peak after applying the limiter.

02

Balance Low End

The low end is heavy, which can make the mix muddy.

How: Apply a gentle high‑pass or low‑shelf cut around 80 Hz, or reduce the sub bass level by a few dB. Re‑listen to ensure clarity.

What's working

  • Good loudness for genre
  • No clipping detected
  • Healthy dynamics for the genre
Tonal balance
Sub
+5.8 dB
Bass
-0.6 dB

Compared with typical masters in this genre. Indicators, not verdicts.

All findings

Loudness
Loudness fits the genre
Track loudness
-7.1 LUFS
Typical genre loudness
-9.0 to -5.5 LUFS
Spotify volume change
-6.9 dB
Peaks
True peak is above 0 dB
True peak
0.2 dBTP
No clipping detected
Clipping events
0
Dynamics
Healthy dynamics for the genre
Peak-to-loudness ratio
7.3 dB
Minimum healthy peak-to-loudness ratio
5.0 dB
Loudness range
1.7 LU
Tone
Low end is heavy
Sub vs genre
+5.8 dB
Bass vs genre
-0.6 dB
Stereo
Stereo image is healthy
Stereo correlation
0.962
Side level vs center
-17.1 dB
AI detection

No strong signs of AI generation were found in the 117 seconds analyzed.

Automated estimate, not proof. It can be wrong either way.